Cutting Down "We Buy Houses for Cash" Signs — Because They're Illegal


Cutting down illegal "We Buy Houses for Cash" signs has become a hobby of mine. Those signs get stuck up without permission — nobody approved them being there — and what the companies behind them really sell homeowners is a discount on their own house. Let me explain what I mean.

The big pitch from cash buyers is speed: quick possession, no hassle, sell it fast. But here's a real comparison. I sold a house before it even got on the market, and it sold for $33,000 less than what it was listed for — and the buyers still got possession in under 21 days. It wasn't on the market for a day. So a regular sale moved just as fast as any cash offer promises, without the seller having to give away their equity to get that speed.

That's what those signs don't tell you. When you sell to the "we buy houses for cash" guys, you're often selling for 20% less than you'd get selling the normal way. Twenty percent of your home's value is an enormous price to pay for convenience — especially when the normal route can close quickly too.

Don't fall for it. If someone's whole business model is buying your house fast and cheap, the speed isn't a favour they're doing you — it's the product they're buying, and you're the one paying for it. Before you answer one of those signs, find out what your home would actually sell for. You might be surprised how fast it moves, and how much more of your own money you keep.

Key takeaways

  • "We Buy Houses for Cash" signs are posted without permission — they're illegal, and I cut them down.
  • Cash buyers pitch quick possession, but a normal sale can move just as fast: one of my sales closed with possession in under 21 days.
  • That house sold before it even hit the market, for $33,000 under its list price — speed doesn't require a cash buyer.
  • Selling to cash buyers often means accepting about 20% less for your home. Don't fall for it.

Watch the original Short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4_K-OmSZXkA

Follow me for free investment real estate education!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3 Houses in a Row: Why the Land Beside a Park Is Worth More Than the House

Image
On one street, there are three houses in a row — and my family owns all three. My wife and I own two of them, side by side, and my mom owns the third one right next door. People ask why we'd concentrate our buying on a single row of houses, and the answer is sitting right across the street: a park. That's the whole strategy. The houses themselves are modest, but they're not really what we bought. We bought the land under them, in that location. A park doesn't move. The amenity across the street is permanent, and over time the land in a spot like that is going to be worth way more than the house sitting on it. This is the oldest rule in real estate: location, location, location. Houses age, wear out, and eventually get torn down or rebuilt. Land in the right place just keeps getting scarcer and more valuable. When you're choosing between a nicer house in a weaker location and an ordinary house on great land, the great land is usually the better long-term buy. It'...
Read more

Incredible Residential Garage with a Mezzanine: You Could Rent Out the Garage for $700 a Month

Image
Here's a property where the garage is the headline act. It's so big I joke that you buy the garage and the house comes free — and honestly, it's the biggest residential garage I've ever seen. It's not just wide or deep, either: there's a full mezzanine level inside it. The house itself is really nice, but the garage is what makes this place an investor's kind of property. Most buyers walk through a home and judge it on bedrooms, bathrooms, and kitchen finishes. Investors need to look at the extras, because extras are where the hidden income lives. A garage this size isn't just parking and storage — it's rentable space. Space like this could rent out for $700 a month, and that's income most buyers never even think to count when they're running their numbers. That's the lesson here. Two buyers can look at the exact same property and see completely different deals, because one of them only sees a house and the other sees a house plus a secon...
Read more

It's Cheaper to Own a Vacation Home Than to Rent One

Image
My mom couldn't afford to rent her vacation home — so she bought it instead. That sounds backwards until you run her numbers, and her numbers are exactly why she owns the place today instead of handing a landlord a small fortune every winter. Here's the math she walked me through. Renting the home in prime time would cost $23,000 Canadian a month. Broken down nightly, that's $545 US a night — and she likes to stay for three months at a time. Three months of prime-time rent adds up to roughly $75,000. As she put it, she doesn't have $75,000 to spend on a vacation rental. Most people don't. So she flipped the problem around. Instead of paying $75,000 in rent and having nothing to show for it, she bought the home. The place isn't a cost sitting empty the rest of the year, either — she rents it out for ten months, and the rental income is what carries the property while she's not there. Then comes the best part: because she owns it, she gets to stay there for tw...
Read more