3 Houses in a Row: Why the Land Beside a Park Is Worth More Than the House
On one street, there are three houses in a row — and my family owns all three. My wife and I own two of them, side by side, and my mom owns the third one right next door. People ask why we'd concentrate our buying on a single row of houses, and the answer is sitting right across the street: a park.
That's the whole strategy. The houses themselves are modest, but they're not really what we bought. We bought the land under them, in that location. A park doesn't move. The amenity across the street is permanent, and over time the land in a spot like that is going to be worth way more than the house sitting on it.
This is the oldest rule in real estate: location, location, location. Houses age, wear out, and eventually get torn down or rebuilt. Land in the right place just keeps getting scarcer and more valuable. When you're choosing between a nicer house in a weaker location and an ordinary house on great land, the great land is usually the better long-term buy.
It's also why buying as a family has worked so well here. Between us, we control the whole row, which only strengthens the position as that land appreciates. When you find a location you believe in, don't be afraid to keep buying it.
Key takeaways
- My wife and I own two of the three side-by-side houses; my mom owns the third.
- The reason for buying the whole row is across the street: a park — a permanent amenity that anchors the location's value.
- Eventually the land will be worth way more than the houses on it.
- Location, location, location: buy the land in the right spot and let time do the work.
Watch the original Short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dt1Fi6ZHgDo
Follow me for free investment real estate education!

Comments
Post a Comment